BENCHMARKS
The numbers, on the record
TPC-DS results on open tables, measured against legacy lakehouse and query engines across formats, warehouse sizes, and query types. Each figure notes the exact setup it came from.
RESULTSTPC-DS · open formats
VS. LEGACY LAKEHOUSE ENGINE
3.09x
Faster
TPC-DS · Delta · 8 QPS
VS. LEGACY QUERY ENGINE
11.02x
Faster
TPC-DS · Fabric · 30 cores
QUERY TYPE: COMPARISON
1.58x
Faster
TPC-DS · Delta · AWS · XS
VS. LEGACY LAKEHOUSE ENGINE
67.64%
Lower cost
TPC-DS · Delta · 8 QPS
VS. LEGACY QUERY ENGINE
7.04x
Faster
TPC-DS · Iceberg · XS
QUERY TYPE: LOGICAL
1.80x
Faster
TPC-DS · Delta · AWS · XS
VS. LEGACY LAKEHOUSE ENGINE
3.08x
Lower p99 latency
TPC-DS · Delta · 8 QPS
E6DATA + FABRIC
60.05%
Lower cost
TPC-DS · Fabric · 30 cores
HIGH CONCURRENCY
1.20x
Faster
TPC-DS · Delta · AWS · XS
How we measure
Every result runs on the TPC-DS benchmark against open tables, with the format, cloud, and warehouse size stated on the card. Speedups compare like for like on the same data and query set; cost figures compare total compute for the same workload.
Book a demo on your own workloads
Reach out to book a demo, share challenges you're facing, and tell us how this fits into what you're currently working on or thinking about.
Prefer to self-serve? Problems we're solving →