USE CASE

Scale your querying agent

Agents query in bursts and in parallel, a concurrency pattern that step-jump engines price badly. e6data was built for the concurrency agents demand, scaling by the vCPU on your open tables.

PROBLEMS THIS SOLVES

The problems this solves

Agents create query volume dashboards never did

Concurrency spikes unpredictably as agents fan out into many parallel queries.

Latency degrades under that concurrency

Legacy engines trade throughput for latency; agentic analytics needs both at once.

Cost scales with every new agent

Per-cluster pricing punishes exactly the growth you are trying to enable.

Bursts scale out, not into a queue

Agent orchestrators, RAG apps, and tools keep their interfaces. e6data replaces the engine underneath, so parallel calls fan out instead of waiting on a coordinator.

W/O E6DATA
agent orchestratorRAG apptools & functionsAPIs
COORDINATOR QUEUE
any governance · any catalogany table formatany cloud · on-prem · hybrid
W/ E6DATA
agent orchestratorRAG apptools & functionsAPIs
e6dataNO COORDINATOR · FANS OUT BY 1 VCPU
any governance · any catalogany table formatany cloud · on-prem · hybrid

Every agent call runs on compute sized in 1-vCPU increments, so idle agents cost nothing between bursts.

RUNS WITH YOUR DATA STACK

No custom glue code needed

LAKEHOUSE

Queries directly, with zero data movement.

TABLE FORMAT

Iceberg, Delta, and Hudi, at full performance.

CATALOG

Plugs into any catalog, no rule rewrites.

APPLICATION

Connects to any BI, RAG app, or agent.

GOVERNANCE

Inherits your existing controls and policies.

Concurrency the way agents actually query

Concurrency without a coordinator

No central driver to bottleneck, so thousands of parallel agent calls scale out instead of queueing behind each other.

proof: 1,000+ QPS with p95 under 2s

Per-call economics

Each burst runs on compute sized in 1-vCPU increments, so idle agents cost nothing between calls and spikes do not over-provision.

proof: scales in 1-vCPU increments

Vector search on your tables

Semantic search on unstructured data with cosine similarity, on the same open tables. No separate vector store to sync.

proof: zero data movement
RESULTS

Built for agentic concurrency

p95 < 2s
under high concurrency

Latency holds flat as agent traffic climbs, so answers stay fast enough to act on.

1,000+
QPS sustained

The engine serves the query volume a fleet of agents generates, not just human clicks.

1 vCPU
scaling increment

Compute grows and shrinks with demand, so you pay only for the concurrency in use.

POWERED BY · QUERY ENGINE

This use case runs on the e6data Query engine

Kubernetes-native SQL and AI analytics on your open tables: 1,000+ QPS at p95 under 2s, scaling by the vCPU with no coordinator single point of failure.

Questions your team will ask

Plain answers for the evaluator in the room.

Why do agents strain a normal engine?+

Agents fire many small queries in parallel bursts. Step-jump engines answer a burst by doubling the whole cluster, so cost climbs far faster than load. e6data fans out in 1-vCPU increments instead.

Do I need a separate vector database?+

No. Vector search runs on the same engine and the same open tables with cosine similarity, so there is no second store to sync or govern.

Will it run in my environment?+

Any cloud, your VPC, on-prem, hybrid, air-gapped, or sovereign. Agents connect through JDBC, the Python connector, or your existing APIs.

Book a demo on your own workloads

Reach out to book a demo, share challenges you're facing, and tell us how this fits into what you're currently working on or thinking about.

Prefer to self-serve? Problems we're solving

An actual person replies. By submitting, you acknowledge your personal information will be processed in accordance with our Privacy Policy.